How We Use AI
We draft with AI assistance and edit by hand. Here is exactly which parts of that are machine work, which parts are ours, and where the responsibility sits.
The short version
Guides and posts on Stock Tips Daily are drafted with the help of AI tools and then reviewed and edited by our editors before anything goes live. The tools help us cover more ground and keep explanations consistent from one guide to the next. They have no say in what counts as accurate. Our editors set the standard a page has to meet, and they carry the responsibility for what ends up published under their name.
What the tools actually do
The work starts with an editor deciding what a page has to answer and who is asking it. The drafting tools turn that into a first pass: structure, worked examples, the plain-English version of an idea that would otherwise take three paragraphs. On a small desk that is genuinely useful, because it means a guide can be built out properly rather than left thin.
A first pass is all it is. Every article you read here has been through editing after that, and most have been through several rounds of it, including rewrites of whole sections where the draft explained something in a way a reader would have to work at.
Where the numbers come from
Language tools are fluent, and fluency is exactly the problem. They will produce a confident-sounding statistic that has no source behind it, which in a field about people's money is the failure mode that matters most. So we hold to one rule without exception: a figure we cannot stand behind does not appear.
In practice that means the arithmetic on this site is shown rather than asserted. When a claim rests on maths, whether that is a break-even win rate, a drawdown recovery or a position size, the calculation is on the page so you can check it against your own numbers. Where a figure would need a source we do not have, we describe the behaviour qualitatively and leave the number out. You will find that in place of the pattern success rates that circulate freely elsewhere, because we have never been able to trace them to anything.
What we will not use it for
- Trade signals, stock picks, price predictions or market forecasts. We do not publish those at all, by any method.
- Personal financial advice. We are a publisher, and we are not licensed to tell you what to do with your money. See the risk disclaimer.
- Invented quotes, invented data, or a story about the market that the figures do not support.
- Credentials, track records or trading histories that belong to nobody.
Who is accountable
A person is. We do not put a writer's name on a page, because that would say a person wrote it. What we put there instead is the name of the person who reviewed it, which is the part a human is actually answerable for. When something is wrong on this site, the fault is ours and the fix is ours. Pointing at a tool would be no kind of answer, and we would not offer it as one. The editorial policy sets out how pages are scoped, checked and corrected, and the writers are listed on the about page.
Why we bother telling you
Plenty of sites are produced this way and say nothing. We would rather you heard it from us, and there is a practical reason as well as a principled one. If you know how a page was made, you know what to check. The value of a guide comes from whether its reasoning holds and its arithmetic survives contact with your own trading, and that test is the same whoever typed the first draft.
Some articles carry a note under the byline pointing back to this page. This disclosure applies to the site as a whole, so treat it as covering anything you read here.
If you spot something wrong
Tell us and we will fix it. Corrections are the reader feedback we act on fastest, and a specific one, naming the page and the sentence or figure at issue, gets dealt with quickest of all. The contact page is the way through.